BHP Billiton Ltd. (NYSE: BHP) said Nov. 16 it hopes to fully divest its troubled U.S. onshore shale business in around two years and is also seeking a buyer for its nickel business in Australia.
The renewed push to unload both sets of assets, which the world's biggest mining company no longer deems strategic, comes as prices for oil and nickel enjoy a price resurgence.
"Nickel West is noncore, shale is noncore," BHP CEO Andrew Mackenzie told reporters following the company's annual general meeting in Melbourne.
RELATED: BHP’s US Shale Exit Opens Prized Delaware Assets To All Comers
Nickel prices are up around 16% from January percent this year, while oil has risen about 9%.
"We do consider we will see reasonable oil prices going forward, which is good for the businesses we retain and also the sales process," Mackenzie said.
BHP entered the shale business at the height of the fracking boom in 2011 and invested billions developing the operations. A subsequent fall in oil prices resulted in pre-tax writedowns of about $13 billion.
An exit from the shale business is one of the main demands of activist shareholders led by New York-based Elliott Management, who have pressed for a change of strategy by the global miner.
BHP acquired Nickel West in 2005 and several attempts in the past to sell it have failed.
The miner allocated $43 million in August to build a processing plant to convert nickel into a powder-like material that could be used to make special batteries for electric vehicles, leading some to believe the division would remain in the company.
"We are just finding the right time in the market to offload," Mackenzie said.
In shale, BHP recently sold a small portion of the onshore shale acreage, kicking off plans for a full exit over time.
"We really want to get this done in two years, ideally a bit less," Mackenzie said during the shareholders' meeting.
"What you have to do is build quite a comprehensive data room so that a wide range of people can come and look and kick the tires before they buy," he said.
Mackenzie made it clear there was little chance BHP would retain any exposure to shale.
"At this stage, I see no way back," he said.
Recommended Reading
Exclusive: ‘Reality Has Hit,’ NatGas Not Just a Bridge Fuel, Landrieu Says
2024-04-11 - The Biden administration's LNG pause is "disappointing" and natural gas is a "solution to energy woes," co-chairs for Natural Allies for a Clean Energy Future Senator Mary Landrieu and Congressman Kendrick Meek told Hart Energy's Jordan Blum at CERAWeek by S&P Global.
Belcher: Our Leaders Should Embrace, Not Vilify, Certified Natural Gas
2024-03-18 - Recognition gained through gas certification verified by third-party auditors has led natural gas producers and midstream companies to voluntarily comply and often exceed compliance with regulatory requirements, including the EPA methane rule.
Hirs: LNG Plan is a Global Fail
2024-03-13 - Only by expanding U.S. LNG output can we provide the certainty that customers require to build new gas power plants, says Ed Hirs.
Pitts: Producers Ponder Ramifications of Biden’s LNG Strategy
2024-03-13 - While existing offtake agreements have been spared by the Biden administration's LNG permitting pause, the ramifications fall on supplying the Asian market post-2030, many analysts argue.
The Problem with the Pause: US LNG Trade Gets Political
2024-02-13 - Industry leaders worry that the DOE’s suspension of approvals for LNG projects will persuade global customers to seek other suppliers, wreaking havoc on energy security.