A U.S. judge on July 19 dismissed a lawsuit by New York City seeking to hold major oil companies liable for climate change caused by carbon emissions from burning fossil fuels.
In dismissing the city’s claims against Chevron Corp. (NYSE: CVX), BP Plc (NYSE: BP), ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP), Exxon Mobil Corp. (NYSE: XOM) and Royal Dutch Shell Plc (NYSE: RDS.A), U.S. District Judge John Keenan in Manhattan said climate change must be addressed through federal regulation and foreign policy.
“Climate change is a fact of life, as is not contested by defendants,” he wrote. “But the serious problems caused thereby are not for the judiciary to ameliorate. Global warming and solutions thereto must be addressed by the two other branches of government.”
Seth Stein, a spokesman for New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio, said the city planned to appeal the decision.
“The mayor believes big polluters must be held accountable for their contributions to climate change and the damage it will cause New York City,” Stein said.
The city sued the oil companies in January and announced it intended to divest fossil fuel investments from its $189 billion public pension funds over the next five years.
The city said the companies knew for years that carbon emissions caused global warming, yet they promoted fossil fuels while pushing public relations efforts to discredit science on the risks of climate change. The city said it must spend billions of dollars to safeguard against flooding and other hazards of global warming, and sought money damages.
The oil companies moved to dismiss the case on numerous grounds, including that the federal Clean Air Act authorizes only the Environmental Protection Agency to bring lawsuits over pollution.
Keenan agreed with that argument on July 19. He also said that because climate change is a global problem, the city’s claims “implicate countless foreign governments and their laws and policies,” and could not be decided by a court.
“Judge Keenan got it exactly right,” Theodore Boutrous, a lawyer for Chevron, said in a statement.
Shell, Exxon and ConocoPhillips all said they were pleased with the court ruling.
“Judge Keenan’s decision reaffirms our view that climate change is a complex societal challenge that requires sound governmental policy and is not an issue for the courts,” Shell said in a statement.
ConocoPhillips spokesman Daren Beaudo said climate change was “a global issue that requires global policies and solutions.”
BP could not immediately be reached for comment.
Recommended Reading
NOG Closes Utica Shale, Delaware Basin Acquisitions
2024-02-05 - Northern Oil and Gas’ Utica deal marks the entry of the non-op E&P in the shale play while it’s Delaware Basin acquisition extends its footprint in the Permian.
California Resources Corp., Aera Energy to Combine in $2.1B Merger
2024-02-07 - The announced combination between California Resources and Aera Energy comes one year after Exxon and Shell closed the sale of Aera to a German asset manager for $4 billion.
DXP Enterprises Buys Water Service Company Kappe Associates
2024-02-06 - DXP Enterprise’s purchase of Kappe, a water and wastewater company, adds scale to DXP’s national water management profile.
Pioneer Natural Resources Shareholders Approve $60B Exxon Merger
2024-02-07 - Pioneer Natural Resources shareholders voted at a special meeting to approve a merger with Exxon Mobil, although the deal remains under federal scrutiny.
Parker Wellbore, TDE Partner to ‘Revolutionize’ Well Drilling
2024-03-13 - Parker Wellbore and TDE are offering what they call the industry’s first downhole high power, high bandwidth data highway.