Oil prices slipped on Sept. 29 as investors questioned whether an OPEC agreement to curb production—the group's first such deal since 2008—would be enough to rebalance a heavily over-supplied market.
OPEC agreed on Sept. 28 to cut output to 32.5 million barrels per day (MMbbl/d) to 33 MMbbl/d from around 33.5 MMbbl/d, estimated by Reuters to be the output level in August.
Prices rose 6% on Sept. 28, feeding general risk appetite and boosting energy shares. The European oil and gas index was up 4% on Sept. 29 and the pan-European STOXX 600 index rose 2%.
RELATED: OPEC Agrees To Stop The Bleeding At 32.5 MMbbl/d
But oil prices retreated as skepticism over the effectiveness of the deal led to profit taking.
Benchmark Brent crude futures were down 33 cents a bbl at $48.42 by 5:38 a.m. CT (10:38 GMT), after earlier climbing to a high of $49.09, its strongest since Sept. 9. Brent settled up $2.72/bbl, or 5.9%, on Sept. 28.
West Texas Intermediate was down 17 cents at $46.88/bbl, after first hitting $47.47, its highest since Sept. 8.
Many analysts said there was a lack of clarity over too many details and there was a risk the deal could unravel.
"With such uncertainty around the minutiae, we expect uncommon volatility in the oil market until OPEC's November meeting," analysts at ING said.
How much each country will produce is to be decided at the next formal OPEC meeting in November, when an invitation to join cuts could also be extended to non-OPEC countries such as Russia.
It is not clear when the agreement would come into effect, how compliance with the agreement will be verified, what new quotas for countries would be and how long the deal would remain in effect, analysts said.
And a cut in OPEC production might do little to reduce oversupply, given uncertainty about output from Iran, Libya and Nigeria.
"The problem of surpluses will not be solved if these countries take full advantage of their capacities," Commerzbank chief commodities analyst Eugen Weinberg said.
Moreover, if oil prices were to rise, it could also lead to a surge in non-OPEC output.
U.S. bank Goldman Sachs expects the OPEC deal to add $7-$10 to oil prices in the first half of 2017.
"We think that OPEC is running a dangerous game if the aim is to push the crude oil price higher from here in the short term as it would just activate more U.S. shale oil production," said Bjarne Schieldrop, chief commodity analyst at Nordic bank SEB.
Recommended Reading
US Interior Department Releases Offshore Wind Lease Schedule
2024-04-24 - The U.S. Interior Department’s schedule includes up to a dozen lease sales through 2028 for offshore wind, compared to three for oil and gas lease sales through 2029.
Utah’s Ute Tribe Demands FTC Allow XCL-Altamont Deal
2024-04-24 - More than 90% of the Utah Ute tribe’s income is from energy development on its 4.5-million-acre reservation and the tribe says XCL Resources’ bid to buy Altamont Energy shouldn’t be blocked.
Mexico Presidential Hopeful Sheinbaum Emphasizes Energy Sovereignty
2024-04-24 - Claudia Sheinbaum, vying to becoming Mexico’s next president this summer, says she isn’t in favor of an absolute privatization of the energy sector but she isn’t against private investments either.
Venture Global Gets FERC Nod to Process Gas for LNG
2024-04-23 - Venture Global’s massive export terminal will change natural gas flows across the Gulf of Mexico but its Plaquemines LNG export terminal may still be years away from delivering LNG to long-term customers.
US EPA Expected to Drop Hydrogen from Power Plant Rule, Sources Say
2024-04-22 - The move reflects skepticism within the U.S. government that the technology will develop quickly enough to become a significant tool to decarbonize the electricity industry.