Shareholders in Norway’s largest company, Statoil ASA (NYSE: STO), will approve on May 15 the board’s proposal to change its name as the company seeks to diversify its business and attract young talent concerned about fossil fuels’ impact on climate change.
From May 16, the majority state-owned company will change its 46-year-old name to Equinor and trade on the Oslo Exchange under the new ticker EQNR.
The Norwegian government, which has a 67% stake in the firm, has said it will back the move.
The oil and gas company said the name change was a natural step after it decided last year to become a “broad energy” firm, investing up to 15% to 20% of annual capex in “new energy solutions” by 2030, mostly in offshore wind.
“The key reason for a company to change its name is when it wants to widen the scope of its activity or direction. Another reason would be because it is in trouble, and it has a reputational problem,” Allyson Stewart-Allen, a London-based international branding expert and the CEO of International Marketing Partners, told Reuters. “I don’t believe that’s the case with Statoil.”
While the company’s profits are growing again, its hydrocarbon business has come under increased scrutiny after the Paris climate deal in 2016.
“A name with ‘oil’ as a component would increasingly be a disadvantage. None of our competitors has that. It served us really well for 50 years. I don’t think it will be the best name for the next 50 years,” Statoil CEO Eldar Saetre told Reuters.
The new name was meant to arouse curiosity among young people so they see the other aspects of Statoil, including renewable energy, he added.
Technology students became less interested in working for oil firms after oil prices crashed in 2014 and renewable energy gained in prominence.
Statoil ranked 15th in an annual survey of the Nordic country's most attractive employers conducted by karrierestart.no, a Norwegian careers website, and Norwegian firm Evidente, published on May 3. In 2013, it ranked first.
There are signs, however, that the name change could help it climb the ranks.
“Students who answered the survey after [news of] the name change found Statoil to be between 5% and 10% more attractive as an employer,” Arne Kvalsvik at Evidente said. “It’s likely that Statoil’s name change will have a positive impact on its reputation going forward.”
Statoil said it remained the first choice among technology students, citing another survey by Swedish firm Universum.
Truls Gulowsen, head of Greenpeace Norway, said the name change would not be sufficient to improve Statoil's image as long as the firm was exploring in vulnerable areas such as the Arctic or the Great Australian Bight.
Recommended Reading
TPG Adds Lebovitz as Head of Infrastructure for Climate Investing Platform
2024-02-07 - TPG Rise Climate was launched in 2021 to make investments across asset classes in climate solutions globally.
Air Products Sees $15B Hydrogen, Energy Transition Project Backlog
2024-02-07 - Pennsylvania-headquartered Air Products has eight hydrogen projects underway and is targeting an IRR of more than 10%.
NGL Growth Leads Enterprise Product Partners to Strong Fourth Quarter
2024-02-02 - Enterprise Product Partners executives are still waiting to receive final federal approval to go ahead with the company’s Sea Port Terminal Project.
Sherrill to Lead HEP’s Low Carbon Solutions Division
2024-02-06 - Richard Sherill will serve as president of Howard Energy Partners’ low carbon solutions division, while also serving on Talos Energy’s board.
Magnolia Appoints David Khani to Board
2024-02-08 - David Khani’s appointment to Magnolia Oil & Gas’ board as an independent director brings the board’s size to eight members.