It was discussed when I met with senior figures from very different service companies, in terms of their products and scale, at the Subsea Expo event in Aberdeen, Scotland. It also came up at a London briefing, again at a conference in Houston, and furthermore in several operator press statements.
All voiced concerns or provided examples of spending being stalled on a growing number of projects because of cost inflation.
My editorial colleague Steve Sasanow noted it in Hart Energy’s Subsea Engineering News recently: “Another term that continues to pop around the industry is ‘short-term volatility,’ i.e., operators are stashing their checkbooks in the drawer until the market settles and costs come down.”
Statoil has broken out the axe. Over the next three years it wants to reduce its annual capex to around US $20 billion, down 8% on previous estimates. From 2016 onward it wants to realize further annual savings of $1.3 billion.
The bulk of those will come from developments, mainly through standardization. Margareth Øvrum, executive vice president for technology, projects, and drilling, said the aim was to lower well costs by 10% to 20% through standard wells and platform costs by 8% to 10% through standard concepts.
The company’s Johan Sverdrup and Johan Castberg projects offshore Norway are planned to achieve $150 million to $300 million of savings through the use of standardized equipment and modules and between $0.8 billion and $1 billion in savings through the use of vertical christmas trees.
At the Arctic Technology Conference in Houston, Infield's Edward Richardson said longer-term exploration and development there is threatened by moderating commodity prices (Infield sees Brent crude at $92/bbl by 2020), rising costs, and increased competition from other resources such as shale and deep water.
Statoil popped up again, with the company’s Arctic portfolio manager Catherine Jahre-Nilsen saying a big hurdle is demonstrating the commerciality of discoveries in such areas. Just because something is technically possible doesn’t mean it will make money, she warned.
Careful planning on projects is a given. But one of the senior individuals I spoke with – who works for one of the largest contractors– said simply, “I see lots of bad planning constantly in this industry.” He works daily with the largest global oil companies.
There’s no magic answer. Spiraling costs must be controlled, and better efficiencies and reliability achieved – but investments must continue. If operators increasingly opt to delay their investments or cut too deeply, the balance between spending enough while maintaining cost efficiency could shift the wrong way. Bad planning is something the industry can’t afford.
Recommended Reading
US Oil, Gas Rig Count Falls to Lowest Since January 2022
2024-05-03 - The oil and gas rig count, an early indicator of future output, fell by eight to 605 in the week to May 3, in the biggest weekly decline since September 2023.
Pemex Reports Lower 2Q Production and Net Income
2024-05-03 - Mexico’s Pemex reported both lower oil and gas production and a 91% drop in net income in first-quarter 2024, but the company also reduced its total debt to $101.5 billion, executives said during an earnings webcast with analysts.
Chouest Acquires ROV Company ROVOP to Expand Subsea Capabilities
2024-05-02 - With the acquisition of ROVOP, Chouest will have a fleet of more than 100 ROVs.
SLB, OneSubsea, Subsea 7 Sign Collaboration Deal with Equinor
2024-05-02 - Work is expected to begin immediately on Equinor’s Wisting and Bay Du Nord projects.
SilverBow Makes Horseshoe Lateral in Austin Chalk
2024-05-01 - SilverBow Resources’ 8,900-foot lateral was drilled in Live Oak County at the intersection of South Texas’ oil and condensate phases. It's a first in the Chalk.