Investors are increasingly considering ESG factors before committing to invest in new LNG projects, analysts at S&P Global Platts and S&P Global Ratings said on March 24.
The net-zero LNG trade, which typically involves companies offsetting emissions, is expected to grow as the discussion on the energy transition to a carbon-neutral world gathers pace, they said. Net-zero trade arrived as a fledgling market to a 360 million tonnes LNG industry.
“It is almost surprising the prominence that ESG considerations have started to take in conversations,” lead analyst in the Energy Infrastructure Group of S&P Global Ratings Stephen Goltz said during a press briefing.
“It is not something that is just sitting with counterparties. To a certain degree it is also being influenced by the investment community as well,” he said.
RELATED:
Tellurian CEO: Natural Gas Must Fuel the Energy Transition
The comments come as governments and companies start to take action to reduce the LNG's industry carbon footprint.
Earlier this month, Russian energy giant Gazprom PAO delivered its first carbon-neutral shipment of LNG to Europe.
Cheniere Energy Inc., the largest U.S. LNG producer, said in February it will provide greenhouse gas emissions data associated with each cargo to customers beginning in 2022.
While LNG can produce about 50% less emissions than carbon-intense fuels such as coal, the demand destruction during the coronavirus pandemic has encouraged a shift from fossil fuels straight to renewables by some players.
Last October, the French government asked power group Engie SA to hold off on signing a multibillion-dollar U.S. LNG import contract on concerns over the environmental implications of the deal.
One month later, Danish shipping company AP Moller-Maersk A/S ruled out LNG investments, saying it will move straight to a CO₂-neutral type of fuel.
Some counterparties are stepping back from new projects as the role of LNG in the energy transition is reviewed. It is unlikely that all LNG projects that got permits will get off the ground, S&P Global Ratings’ Goltz said.
“It’s unclear to them how the market will look like in 20 years from now,” he said.
Recommended Reading
Kimmeridge-SilverBow Public Feud Gets Ugly as Firm Suggests New Directors
2024-04-01 - Kimmeridge Energy Management said in a letter that should SilverBow continue to “stonewall” consideration of a merger offer, shareholders should elect three new independent board members.
SilverBow Gears Up for Proxy Fight with Kimmeridge
2024-04-09 - Both SilverBow Resources and Kimmeridge Energy Management have proposed a slate of candidates for the board of directors with a vote set for May 21.
Could Crescent, SilverBow Buy More in South Texas After $2.1B Deal?
2024-05-17 - The combination of Crescent Energy and SilverBow Resources will yield one of the Eagle Ford’s top producers—and the pro forma E&P could look to gobble up more acreage in South Texas after closing.
Crescent Energy to Buy Eagle Ford’s SilverBow for $2.1 Billion
2024-05-16 - Crescent Energy’s acquisition of SilverBow Resources will create the second largest Eagle Ford Shale E&P with production of about 250,000 boe/d, the companies said.
Making Bank: Top 10 Oil and Gas Dealmakers in North America
2024-02-29 - MergerLinks ranks the key dealmakers behind the U.S. biggest M&A transactions of 2023.